Charleston Third-Party Liability Claims Against Truck Drivers

Tractor-trailers use the roads and highways surrounding Charleston daily, unfortunately causing many accidents. According to the Department of Public Safety, there were a total of 17,533 accidents involving trucks in 2015. Further statistics show that there were nearly 6,000 people injured and over three hundred people killed because of accidents with trucks. Anyone who suffered an injury in an accident involving a truck may choose to file a third-party liability claim.

If you or someone you know suffered an injury in a truck accident, contact a dedicated injury attorney with experience in Charleston third-party liability claims against truck drivers to discuss your options and whether filing a third-party liability claim would be beneficial to you.

Third-Party Liability Claims in Charleston

There are several common scenarios which may lead someone to consider filing Charleston third-party liability claims against truck drivers. If a truck malfunctions, an individual may file a lawsuit against the truck’s manufacturer. If a person is riding in a car as a passenger, they may file a third-party liability claim if they suffer an injury in an accident involving a truck.

Finally, one of the most common scenarios where someone may choose to file a third-party liability claim is when an individual suffers an injury from a truck while they are working. In this instance, an employee must carefully consider whether they would like to file a workers’ compensation action or Charleston third-party liability claims against truck drivers.

Proving Third-Party Negligence

To obtain compensation for an injury, an individual must demonstrate that the other party was liable. Proving third-party liability in a truck accident is very similar to proving negligence in any other type of claim. To successfully file and receive compensation Charleston third-party liability claims against truck drivers, an individual must prove that the third-party truck driver owed the plaintiff a duty of care, they breached the duty of care, their acts were the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries, and that the plaintiff suffered an injury or damage as a result.

Differences Between Third-Party Liability and Workers’ Compensation Claims

Charleston employees are largely covered under the Workers’ Compensation Act for injuries and losses they sustain during the course of employment. Under the Workers’ Compensation Act, an employee who suffers an injury during the course of their employment is generally entitled to certain benefits covering medical expenses, lost wages, and disability.

Charleston third-party liability claims against truck drivers differ in that an individual must choose to go outside of the workers’ compensation system and file a civil claim. Under South Carolina’s Workers’ Compensation Act section 42-1-560, someone who suffers an injury in a truck accident may choose to file a workers’ compensation claim, file a third-party liability claim, or pursue both claims.

However, the Workers’ Compensation Act does not allow an employee to recover against both their employer and another party, which means that an insurance carrier may be reimbursed for any award that an employee receives from a third-party truck driver.

Understanding Charleston Third-Party Liability Claims Against Truck Drivers

If you suffered an injury due to a truck accident, it is easy to become quickly overwhelmed with aggressive insurance companies, medical bills, and internal policies. However, a knowledgeable lawyer with experience in Charleston third-party liability claims against truck drivers can help you prove liability, negotiate settlement offers, and recover the proper compensation for your injuries.

cta

Free Consultation

(987) 654-3210

The contents of this Web site are for informational purposes regarding legal issues in South Carolina and are not intended to convey detailed legal advice on specific issues. Transmission of the information contained in this site or any sites linked hereto is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions we are properly authorized to do so and do not seek to represent anyone in any jurisdiction where this site does not comply with applicable laws and bar rules. The lawyers of the law firm of Christmas Law Firm are licensed to practice law in the State of South Carolina. Readers should not act upon the information contained in this site without first seeking the advice of an attorney licensed to practice in your area.

Attorneys principally practice in Mt. Pleasant office, but we will meet you at the time and office most convenient to you. We will also come to your hospital room or home upon request.

The information given above are examples of actual cases with actual clients our law firm has handled in the past. The reviews listed on our website are endorsements and/or testimonials from actual clients. Any results our law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.