Charleston Liability Claims Against Raygo Container Handler Operators

Raygo container handlers are common on the docks on the Port of Charleston. While these machines are very important to the loading and unloading process for heavy shipping containers, there are many instances where a person or a worker may be injured by a negligent Raygo container handler operator.

In these instances, it may be appropriate for an injured worker and their skilled third-party liability attorney to file a civil lawsuit to recover compensation. While South Carolina’s Workers’ Compensation Act generally prohibits an injured worker from suing their employer in civil court, victims may be able to file Charleston liability claims against Raygo container handler operators.

Differences Between Workers’ Compensation and Third-party Liability Claims

In the workers’ compensation system, an injured employee effectively must seek compensation from their employer and insurance carrier for a workplace injury. Workers’ compensation benefits are meant to help people who are injured in their workplace or while on the job, creating an alternative system for injured workers to pursue compensation without going through the civil court system.

However, a third-party liability claim is like a standard personal injury lawsuit. These claims, which are filed with the civil court system, allow injured employees to file lawsuits against an individual other than their employer.

Filing a third-party liability claim requires engaging in a thorough investigation, supporting a claim with evidence, and proving damages. When a third-party liability claim is filed against a Raygo container handler operator in Charleston, legal counsel from a seasoned attorney may be necessary to ensure a smooth and successful case.

Dangers of Raygo Container Handlers

Raygo container handlers are capable of handling thousands of pounds of cargo, which means the improper use of a handler can be extremely dangerous. As such, operating a Raygo container handler correctly requires extensive training and a keen attention to safety.

However, accidents may still occur, and any ensuing injury could lead to devastating pain or cause permanent damage. An injured victim may need time off work or be unable to continue working altogether. In these cases, an accident may have occurred because an operator failed to abide by any number of legal standards, did not exercise proper caution, or because of sheer negligence.

Compensation Available In a Third-Party Liability Claim

While the workers’ compensation system was created to help injured employees recover compensation for workplace injuries, there are several limitations built into the system, many of which restrict how much an injured worker may be able to recover. However, because third-party liability claims are civil claims, an injured worker could seek compensation for:

  • Lost wages
  • Medical expenses
  • Disability
  • Disfigurement
  • Death

A third-party liability claim may also allow a victim to seek non-economic damages such as pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. These types of damages are typically not available under the workers’ compensation system.

How to Get Started Filing Third-Party Liability Claims Against Raygo Container Handler Operators in Charleston

If you have suffered an injury due to another person’s negligence, you may be able to pursue Charleston liability claims against Raygo container handler operators. Through this process, you could receive more compensation than you would through a workers’ compensation claim, especially if you work with an experienced personal injury attorney.

A dedicated legal representative could explain your rights under the workers’ compensation system, as well as your potential right to file a third-party liability claim. Call today to schedule an initial consultation, so you can make a decision about how to best proceed.

 

 

 

 

Disclaimer

cta

Free Consultation

(987) 654-3210

The contents of this Web site are for informational purposes regarding legal issues in South Carolina and are not intended to convey detailed legal advice on specific issues. Transmission of the information contained in this site or any sites linked hereto is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions we are properly authorized to do so and do not seek to represent anyone in any jurisdiction where this site does not comply with applicable laws and bar rules. The lawyers of the law firm of Christmas Law Firm are licensed to practice law in the State of South Carolina. Readers should not act upon the information contained in this site without first seeking the advice of an attorney licensed to practice in your area.

Attorneys principally practice in Mt. Pleasant office, but we will meet you at the time and office most convenient to you. We will also come to your hospital room or home upon request.

The information given above are examples of actual cases with actual clients our law firm has handled in the past. The reviews listed on our website are endorsements and/or testimonials from actual clients. Any results our law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.