Our Blog

South Carolina Personal Injury Lawyers Talk Major Medications And Class Actions

South Carolina Personal Injury Lawyers Talk Major Medications And Class Actions

Our Charleston drug recall lawyers have noticed numerous advertisements on television asking viewers if they have been harmed by a variety of defective consumer products, primarily including asbestos exposure and pharmaceutical drugs. The aim of these ads is to reach out to the American Public, find individuals who have been injured from a product, and form a class action lawsuit against the producers of a product that has caused serious injuries and wrongful deaths. A class action, or a representative action, is a law suit in which a group of people collectively bring a claim against a defendant. The idea being there is strength in numbers when challenging major manufacturers of consumer products, think back to the tobacco litigation of the early and mid 1990s.

Just as an aside, there is a fantastic book that details the development of the class action suit against big tobacco entitled Civil Warriors, and authored by Dan Zegart. It does a superb job of showing the effectiveness of representative action as a means to provide injunctive relief. In the case of the tobacco industry, an example would be the requirement for cigarette makers to eliminate advertisements that attract kids to smoking, like the cartoon character, Joe Camel.

Currently there are a couple of pharmaceutical drugs that have gained national attention because of their harmful side effects to consumers, Topamax and Accutane.

Topamax was originally approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Christmas Eve 1996 as a treatment for total and partial seizures. Later, in 2004, the drug was also approved for the treatment of migraine headaches. But, in March of this year, following a study by the Antiepilptic Drug Pregnancy Registry, the FDA issued a warning to pregnant women taking the drug due its risk of increasing the likelihood of malformation of newborns and birth injuries and defects. The warning issued by the FDA required Topamax’s manufacturer, Ortho-McNeil, to update their warning label, and moved Topamax from a “Category C” drug, to the more dangerous drug classification “Category D.” Taking Topamax while pregnant can cause babies to be born with with both a Cleft Palate and a Cleft Lip.

The prescription drug Accuntane has been on the market much longer than Topamax, almost three decades. It is a powerful medication designed to combat severe nodular acne. Nodular acne is characterized by large acne spots that can be quite painful and can last for months. Nodules themselves are large, hard bumps that develop under the skin’s surface. As a medication, Accutane was quite successful at treating this particular type of acne, but sometimes with success comes failure. Because of Accutane’s effectiveness it began being over-prescribed to treat mild and moderates cases of acne. Long known to be severely dangerous for pregnant women, or those trying to become pregnant, the drug was packaged with overt warnings to prevent the possibility of severe birth defects and mutations in newborns birthed by consumers.

But, in June of 2009 Hoffman LaRoche, producers of Acctune, were forced to take the drug off the shelves due to the company losing a $33 million product liability lawsuit to the injured plaintiff. Unfortunately, the drug is now linked to such dangerous side effects as Inflammatory Bowel Syndrome, Crohn’s Disease, and Ulcerative Colitis. At this time, many successful representative action suits have been brought against Hoffman LaRoche with judgments in excess of $50 million.

The contents of this Web site are for informational purposes regarding legal issues in South Carolina and are not intended to convey detailed legal advice on specific issues. Transmission of the information contained in this site or any sites linked hereto is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions we are properly authorized to do so and do not seek to represent anyone in any jurisdiction where this site does not comply with applicable laws and bar rules. The lawyers of the law firm of Howell and Christmas are licensed to practice law in the State of South Carolina. Readers should not act upon the information contained in this site without first seeking the advice of an attorney licensed to practice in your area.

Attorneys principally practice in Mt. Pleasant office, but we will meet you at the time and office most convenient to you. We will also come to your hospital room or home upon request.

The information given above are examples of actual cases with actual clients our law firm has handled in the past. The reviews listed on our website are endorsements and/or testimonials from actual clients. Any results our law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.

Howell and Christmas is not a partnership but rather an association of two limited liability companies the Howell Law Group and Christmas Law Firm.