Our Blog

Tired, Fatigued Truckers Pose Hazard To South Carolina Drivers

Tired, Fatigued Truckers Pose Hazard To South Carolina Drivers

Truck driver fatigue can prove deadly. Just this past summer, the problem of driver fatigue made headlines when comedian Tracy Morgan was nearly killed in an accident allegedly caused by a sleep-deprived trucker.

In an effort to combat driver fatigue and ensure tired truckers are not on the roads, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) imposed new limits on the number of hours that truckers can work per week and the number of hours they can drive before being required to take a 36-hour rest break, including two overnight periods. These limits have been the subject of a great deal of controversy and have been opposed by professional trucking groups, and now some senators are reportedly trying to change the rules. Recent surveys, however, suggest that most drivers of passenger cars would generally prefer stricter regulations.

According to The Hill, senators disagree on the number of hours that truckers should be permitted to drive before taking a rest break. One senator has pushed an amendment to the Senate appropriations bill to limit the number of hours to 82 per week. This is significantly higher than the current limit set by the FMCSA. Two other senators have introduced their own legislation that instead keeps the limit at 70 hours per week.

When members of the public were surveyed in a study commissioned by the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety and the Truck Safety Coalition, the research revealed that a full 80 percent of people would feel less safe if drivers of semi-trucks were permitted to drive for longer hours. The same percentage of people are opposed to allowing truckers to drive for more weekly hours than they are currently permitted to drive.

One of the senators seeking to keep the limits at 70 hours has expressed concern that without these limits, truckers would be “relentlessly” pressured by trucking companies to continue to work for more hours, even if they were starting to feel tired. A former administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is also concerned about trucks turning into “sweatshops on wheels” when trucking company employers are given more leeway to compel truck drivers to stay on the road longer.

When a driver is fatigued, judgment and reflexes are impaired similar to the way a person is impaired by alcohol. Since large truck crashes are so serious, it is a bad idea to take a chance on a trucker getting behind the wheel when fatigued. Drivers need to ensure that they are awake and aware, and if they don’t, they can be held accountable.

Victims of fatigued trucking crashes should contact an accident lawyer to learn more. Contact Howell & Christmas to request a free consultation regarding any vehicle accident.

The contents of this Web site are for informational purposes regarding legal issues in South Carolina and are not intended to convey detailed legal advice on specific issues. Transmission of the information contained in this site or any sites linked hereto is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions we are properly authorized to do so and do not seek to represent anyone in any jurisdiction where this site does not comply with applicable laws and bar rules. The lawyers of the law firm of Christmas Injury Lawyers are licensed to practice law in the State of South Carolina. Readers should not act upon the information contained in this site without first seeking the advice of an attorney licensed to practice in your area.

Attorneys principally practice in Mt. Pleasant office, but we will meet you at the time and office most convenient to you. We will also come to your hospital room or home upon request.

The information given above are examples of actual cases with actual clients our law firm has handled in the past. The reviews listed on our website are endorsements and/or testimonials from actual clients. Any results our law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.